Technologist Mag
  • Home
  • Tech News
  • AI
  • Apps
  • Gadgets
  • Gaming
  • Guides
  • Laptops
  • Mobiles
  • Wearables
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Trending
    • Press Release

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tech news and updates directly to your inbox.

What's On

4 phones you can buy instead of the Motorola Razr 2025

25 May 2025

You Asked: Best 98-inch TVs, Apple CarPlay just leveled up

25 May 2025

The week in EV tech: Robotaxis are here. Are we ready?

25 May 2025

The 61 Best Outdoor Deals From the REI Anniversary Sale

25 May 2025

Marathon is fighting the ultimate uphill battle

25 May 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Technologist Mag
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • Tech News
  • AI
  • Apps
  • Gadgets
  • Gaming
  • Guides
  • Laptops
  • Mobiles
  • Wearables
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Technologist Mag
Home » Apple May Face Criminal Charges for Allegedly Lying to a Federal Judge
Tech News

Apple May Face Criminal Charges for Allegedly Lying to a Federal Judge

By technologistmag.com30 April 20253 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter Reddit Telegram Pinterest Email

Apple “willfully chose not to comply” with a court order to loosen its app store restrictions—and one of its executives lied under oath about the company’s plans, a federal judge wrote on Wednesday.

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has referred the situation to the US Attorney’s Office in San Francisco “to investigate whether criminal contempt proceedings are appropriate.”

Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In 2021, Gonzalez Rogers presided over a lawsuit brought by Fortnite developer Epic Games over the iPhone maker’s allegedly anticompetitive practices that hampered the ability of developers to generate revenue from the App Store. This included Apple’s policy of taking a 30 percent commission on certain in-app purchases.

While Gonzalez Rogers ultimately ruled in favor of Apple on most counts, she ordered the company to begin allowing developers to market ways to make in-app purchases outside of the App Store ecosystem. Apple responded by lowering its commission to 27 percent on purchases made elsewhere, but it also introduced a series of other changes, including showing so-called scare screens, to dissuade users from making purchases outside its ecosystem.

Last year, Epic challenged in court how Apple was responding to the order, leading Gonzalez Rogers to require the tech giant to turn over documents that contributed to Wednesday’s contempt ruling.

Apple pursued its noncompliance strategy “with the express intent to create new anticompetitive barriers which would, by design and in effect, maintain a valued revenue stream; a revenue stream previously found to be anticompetitive,” Gonzalez Rogers wrote in her ruling on Wednesday. “That it thought this court would tolerate such insubordination was a gross miscalculation.”

She also said that Apple executives tried to hide the real motivations for the changes. “In stark contrast to Apple’s initial in-court testimony, contemporaneous business documents reveal that Apple knew exactly what it was doing and at every turn chose the most anticompetitive option,” Gonzalez Rogers said. She went as far as accusing Alex Roman, a vice president of finance at Apple, of lying during testimony in which he talked about how Apple came to its decision to go with a 27 percent commission on purchases made outside the App Store. “The testimony of Mr. Roman was replete with misdirection and outright lies,” the judge said.

Roman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Citing internal Apple documents from 2023, Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s App Store chief Phillip Schiller “had advocated that Apple comply with the injunction” but that CEO Tim Cook “ignored Schiller and instead allowed Chief Financial Officer Luca Maestri and his finance team to convince him otherwise.”

The judge demanded that Apple immediately comply with her earlier order. “This is an injunction, not a negotiation,” she wrote. “There are no do-overs once a party willfully disregards a court order. Time is of the essence. The Court will not tolerate further delays. As previously ordered, Apple will not impede competition.”

Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney posted on X that the new ruling would bring an end to “Apple’s 15-30% junk fees.”

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Reddit Email
Previous ArticleThe ISS just dodged part of a 20-year-old Chinese rocket
Next Article Urtopia Carbon Fusion GT: a smart e-Bike with dual power and style

Related Articles

4 phones you can buy instead of the Motorola Razr 2025

25 May 2025

You Asked: Best 98-inch TVs, Apple CarPlay just leveled up

25 May 2025

The week in EV tech: Robotaxis are here. Are we ready?

25 May 2025

The 61 Best Outdoor Deals From the REI Anniversary Sale

25 May 2025

Marathon is fighting the ultimate uphill battle

25 May 2025

Review: Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge

25 May 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tech news and updates directly to your inbox.

Don't Miss

You Asked: Best 98-inch TVs, Apple CarPlay just leveled up

By technologistmag.com25 May 2025

On today’s episode of You Asked… What’s the best 98-inch TV for sports? What can…

The week in EV tech: Robotaxis are here. Are we ready?

25 May 2025

The 61 Best Outdoor Deals From the REI Anniversary Sale

25 May 2025

Marathon is fighting the ultimate uphill battle

25 May 2025

Review: Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge

25 May 2025
Technologist Mag
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact
© 2025 Technologist Mag. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.