Technologist Mag
  • Home
  • Tech News
  • AI
  • Apps
  • Gadgets
  • Gaming
  • Guides
  • Laptops
  • Mobiles
  • Wearables
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Trending
    • Press Release

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tech news and updates directly to your inbox.

What's On

Realme GT 7 Series: Global Launch Date, Expected Price in India, Specifications and Features

25 May 2025

NYT Mini Crossword today: puzzle answers for Sunday, May 25

25 May 2025

Nobody 2: Everything we know so far

25 May 2025

4 phones you can buy instead of the Motorola Razr 2025

25 May 2025

You Asked: Best 98-inch TVs, Apple CarPlay just leveled up

25 May 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Technologist Mag
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • Tech News
  • AI
  • Apps
  • Gadgets
  • Gaming
  • Guides
  • Laptops
  • Mobiles
  • Wearables
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Trending
    • Press Release
Technologist Mag
Home » A Judge Says Meta’s AI Copyright Case Is About ‘the Next Taylor Swift’
Tech News

A Judge Says Meta’s AI Copyright Case Is About ‘the Next Taylor Swift’

By technologistmag.com1 May 20253 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter Reddit Telegram Pinterest Email

Meta’s copyright battle with a group of authors, including Sarah Silverman and Ta-Nehisi Coates, will turn on the question of whether the company’s AI tools produce works that can cannibalize the authors’ book sales.

US District Court Judge Vince Chhabria spent several hours grilling lawyers from both sides after they each filed motions for partial summary judgment, meaning they want Chhabria to rule on specific issues of the case rather than leaving each one to be decided at trial. The authors allege that Meta illegally used their work to build its generative AI tools, emphasizing that the company pirated their books through “shadow libraries” like LibGen. The social media giant is not denying that it used the work or that it downloaded books from shadow libraries en masse, but insists that its behavior is shielded by the “fair use” doctrine, an exception in US copyright law that allows for permissionless use of copyrighted work in certain cases, including parody, teaching, and news reporting.

If Chhabria grants either motion, he’ll issue a ruling before the case goes to trial—and likely set an important precedent shaping how courts deal with generative AI copyright cases moving forward. Kadrey v. Meta is one of the dozens of lawsuits filed against AI companies that are winding through the US legal system.

While the authors were heavily focused on the piracy element of the case, Chhabria spoke emphatically about his belief that the big question is whether Meta’s AI tools will hurt book sales and otherwise cause the authors to lose money. “If you are dramatically changing, you might even say obliterating, the market for that person’s work, and you’re saying that you don’t even have to pay a license to that person to use their work to create the product that’s destroying the market for their work—I just don’t understand how that can be fair use,” he told Meta lawyer Kannon Shanmugam. (Shanmugam responded that the suggested effect was “just speculation.”)

Chhabria and Shanmugam went on to debate whether Taylor Swift would be harmed if her music was fed into an AI tool that then created billions of robotic knockoffs. Chhabria questioned how this would impact less-established songwriters. “What about the next Taylor Swift?” he asked, arguing that a “relatively unknown artist” whose work was ingested by Meta would likely have their career hampered if the model produced “a billion pop songs” in their style.

At times, it sounded like the case was the authors’ to lose, with Chhabria noting that Meta was “destined to fail” if the plaintiffs could prove that Meta’s tools created similar works that cratered how much money they could make from their work. But Chhabria also stressed that he was unconvinced the authors would be able to show the necessary evidence. When he turned to the authors’ legal team, led by high-profile attorney David Boies, Chhabria repeatedly asked whether the plaintiffs could actually substantiate accusations that Meta’s AI tools were likely to hurt their commercial prospects. “It seems like you’re asking me to speculate that the market for Sarah Silverman’s memoir will be affected,” he told Boies. “It’s not obvious to me that is the case.”

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Reddit Email
Previous Article3 PlayStation Plus games to play this weekend (May 2-4)
Next Article 3 new Xbox Game Pass games to play this weekend (May 2-5)

Related Articles

NYT Mini Crossword today: puzzle answers for Sunday, May 25

25 May 2025

Nobody 2: Everything we know so far

25 May 2025

4 phones you can buy instead of the Motorola Razr 2025

25 May 2025

You Asked: Best 98-inch TVs, Apple CarPlay just leveled up

25 May 2025

The week in EV tech: Robotaxis are here. Are we ready?

25 May 2025

The 61 Best Outdoor Deals From the REI Anniversary Sale

25 May 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tech news and updates directly to your inbox.

Don't Miss

NYT Mini Crossword today: puzzle answers for Sunday, May 25

By technologistmag.com25 May 2025

Love crossword puzzles but don’t have all day to sit and solve a full-sized puzzle…

Nobody 2: Everything we know so far

25 May 2025

4 phones you can buy instead of the Motorola Razr 2025

25 May 2025

You Asked: Best 98-inch TVs, Apple CarPlay just leveled up

25 May 2025

The week in EV tech: Robotaxis are here. Are we ready?

25 May 2025
Technologist Mag
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact
© 2025 Technologist Mag. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.